隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，每個(gè)人都有購(gòu)買家電和汽車的權(quán)利。然而，家電和汽車也有其利弊。本文將對(duì)這兩者的利弊進(jìn)行比較。 家電的利弊有很多，其中最主要的是耗電量大、維護(hù)成本高等。汽車的利弊主要是污染嚴(yán)重、耗油量大等。 總的來(lái)說(shuō)，家電的利弊遠(yuǎn)大于汽車的利弊。因此，我們應(yīng)該根據(jù)自己的情況選擇合適的產(chǎn)品。

利弊類大作文，社會(huì)類話題

It is suggested that everyone in the world should have a car, a TV and a fridge. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

題目來(lái)源：2022年5月21日大陸雅思大作文（重復(fù)2010年4月24日大陸考題）

1

題目大意

有人建議世界上每個(gè)人都應(yīng)該有用一輛汽車、一臺(tái)冰箱和電視，你認(rèn)為利弊如何？

2

思路解析

這是一道利弊類大作文，討論的是每個(gè)人都擁有汽車、冰箱和電視的利弊。利弊類文章需要強(qiáng)調(diào)在論證上體現(xiàn)合理性，即在具體的分析中，明確能體現(xiàn)出一邊的論述的確是大于另一邊，或是利弊均等，而利弊是否有說(shuō)服力并不取決于觀點(diǎn)的數(shù)量，而是內(nèi)容是否有說(shuō)服力。題目理解上不難，下面月半鴨帶大家來(lái)看下具體觀點(diǎn)。

首先來(lái)看好處，有兩方面。

一是能夠極大的改善人們的生活質(zhì)量。電視機(jī)能夠豐富人們的娛樂(lè)生活；冰箱讓食材特別是肉類和水產(chǎn)儲(chǔ)存更久；汽車則能讓人出行更加方便，不會(huì)受到氣候或公共交通不足的影響。每個(gè)人都會(huì)希望讓自己的生活變得更好，因此讓人們能擁有這些工具是利于個(gè)人的。

二是有利于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。家電和汽車的需求增長(zhǎng)會(huì)促使廠家有動(dòng)力進(jìn)行生產(chǎn)以增加營(yíng)收，過(guò)程中能夠創(chuàng)造大量就業(yè)崗位。同時(shí)，消費(fèi)者和商家的交易過(guò)程中也能為政府帶來(lái)GDP和稅收，進(jìn)而使得政府有更多資金能夠投入各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的建設(shè)和研究。

然后來(lái)看壞處，這里分別給出利大于弊（前者）和弊大于利（后者）兩種思路下的弊端

大量的電器和汽車，會(huì)帶來(lái)環(huán)境污染問(wèn)題和能源消耗問(wèn)題。這些設(shè)備想要正常運(yùn)作需要消耗大量的煤炭和石油，這會(huì)加重能源負(fù)擔(dān)，同時(shí)燃油汽車也會(huì)排放廢氣，進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致溫室效應(yīng)對(duì)環(huán)境造成破壞。（但隨著科技進(jìn)步，更多清潔能源和科技的運(yùn)用使得這個(gè)問(wèn)題能夠得到改善，比如太陽(yáng)能發(fā)電和電動(dòng)汽車。）

弊大于利的話需要扣在everyone上，如果每個(gè)人都擁有電視、冰箱和汽車，那將是一個(gè)非常巨大的數(shù)量。即使能源和廢氣排放能夠解決，但制造這些商品就需要投入巨額的原料，并且迭代過(guò)程中還會(huì)產(chǎn)生大量難以處理的廢棄垃圾。同時(shí)，每個(gè)人都擁有汽車對(duì)于城市的道路系統(tǒng)也會(huì)是個(gè)巨大考驗(yàn)，特別是在大城市中，過(guò)多的私家車運(yùn)行可能會(huì)遭嚴(yán)重的道路堵塞甚至癱瘓，甚至可能都沒(méi)有足夠空間用于停車。（以上海為例，目前私家車大約有350萬(wàn)輛，就已經(jīng)足夠造成道路擁堵了，如果按上海人口2400萬(wàn)人，每人一輛那就是目前數(shù)量的近7倍……）

3

提綱

4

高分范文示例

It is universally accepted that everyone needs a car, a TV, and a fridge to make life more convenient. Though using these facilities may be advantageous for the general public, I personally believe that the potential harm outweighs the advantages.

It can be justified that possessing these facilities brings several benefits to everyday life. Firstly, they help raise people’s standards of living by making life more comfortable. Compared with the past decades when recreational activities were quite limited, the advent of television enriches people’s lives through providing them with greater entertainment. Meanwhile, travelling by private vehicle makes it possible for individuals to enjoy great freedom in planning routes, timing and destinations. In addition, refrigerators help preserve food stuffs so that people who are fully occupied can have easy access to leftovers as food can maintain its natural appearance and nutritive value in the fridge. Secondly, a growing demand for these possessions stimulates production and generates more income for the companies. In the long run, such consumption would further contribute to the national economy, through which governments would be able to accumulate significant tax revenues to subsidize projects that benefit the whole population.

However, a heavy dependence on vehicles and appliances may pose a threat to both the environment and the well-being of the general public. For one thing, having too many vehicles on the roads is likely to cause traffic congestion, and this would also be a major producer of toxic emissions that aggravate environmental pollution and harm people’s health. For another, the manufacturing of automobiles, refrigerators and televisions necessitates a significant amount of resources. Therefore, if every single individual has a demand for these facilities, it would result in massive energy consumption that may be beyond what the globe could offer. Moreover, although environmental concerns may be addressed through technological advancement, energy depletion is by no means reversible.

In conclusion, the possession of cars, TVs, and fridges could bring both benefits and drawbacks, but the negative impacts seem to be more impressive.

范文作者：張喬西

5

相關(guān)詞匯和語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)

Standard of living 生活水平

Recreational activities 娛樂(lè)活動(dòng)

Tax revenue 稅收收入

Toxic emissions 廢氣排放

Aggravate 加劇